Tuesday, May 20, 2014

May 20th, 2014

in·de·pend·ent
[in-di-pen-duhhttp://static.sfdict.com/dictstatic/dictionary/graphics/luna/thinsp.pnghttp://static.sfdict.com/dictstatic/dictionary/graphics/luna/thinsp.pngnt] 
Adjective
1. Not influenced or controlled by others in matters of opinion, conduct, etc.; thinking or acting for oneselfan independent thinker.
2.
Not subject to another's authority or jurisdiction; autonomous; free: an independent businessman.
3.
Not influenced by the thought or action of others: independent research.
4.
Not dependent; not depending or contingent upon something else for existence, operation, etc.
5.
Not relying on another or others for aid or support.

I love this word for so many reasons.  It defines how I have lived my life and conducted my businesses.  You notice in the definitions the word “not” used quite often.  That explains why so many people have trouble adapting to this principle.  Right or wrong, people in general want to belong to a group, any group.  Feeing wanted and needed is part of every persons DNA makeup.

This word contradicts all those years of trying to fit in and be accepted in our society.  When it comes to politics, the time is now more than ever to learn to adapt to the word independent. We have had a two party system in politics for many years.  The independence of breaking outside those two parties has had people being made to believe they don’t fit in.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  The time is now to consider a strong independent candidate to break the two party systems that has been in all honesty failing us as a country. 

The gridlock that is occurring in Washington is nothing new.  It is being magnified due to the fact that we have a black president and a republican party with exceptionally weak leadership.  The head of the national Republican Party and the party itself should be grooming a strong candidate to face the democrats in 2016.  The democrats are in control of the next general election due to many factors, such as 1) they are the incumbent party, 2) have a vice president who may run, 3) have a former secretary of state and a woman who may or may not run.  The point I’m making is they are grooming their possible candidates as we speak.  You hear nothing from the republican side of the aisle except for a lot of “I may” or “may not” run from some of the hopefuls.  The hopefuls by the way will be made up of retread candidates as well as politicians who have changed their course as the wind blows.

The people of this country want and need a third party or Independent party that can produce a strong candidate.  The system is broken and at this point almost beyond repair. The founders of this country never had any intention of seeing lifelong or career politicians.  We can be sure of that.  They saw the need for and wanted it structured as such that it was indeed a government “for the people and by the people”.  That is hardly the case any longer.  A strong independent party would put both the democrats and republicans on notice that we can no longer tolerate the lack of productivity coming out of Washington. 

An independent candidate essentially would have nothing to lose and everything to gain.  They can believe in principles from both parties and actually fit more into the mainstream of this country.  They days of voting along party lines have created such apathy for the process that many people are not exercising one of the most basic and free rights in this country.  If they are lifelong republicans and that party does not have a viable candidate why should they vote in the first place?

The future of politics in this country lies in creating a strong, essential third party.  Call it whatever you like but please make room for the millions of people that want in.

That’s all I have to say about that.

No comments:

Post a Comment